Corrective
and preventive action (CAPA, also called corrective
action/preventive action or simply corrective action)
consists of improvements to an organization's processes taken to eliminate
causes of non-conformities or other undesirable situations.
Corrective vs. Preventive
Action. Professionals frequently express confusion as to the difference
between corrective and preventive action.
A
corrective action deals with a nonconformity that has occurred,
and
a
preventive action addresses the potential for a nonconformity to occur.
What Is CAPA?
- Corrective Action: Elimination of the cause or causes of an existing nonconformity or undesirable situation in order to prevent recurrence.
- Preventive Action: Identification and elimination of the cause(s) of potential nonconformities in order to prevent occurrence.
What is the purpose of a CAPA?
The
purpose of the corrective and preventive action subsystem is to collect
information, analyze information, identify and investigate product and quality
problems, and take appropriate and effective corrective and/or preventive
action to prevent their recurrence.
Defining Correction, Corrective Action and Preventive Action
- Correction: Action to eliminate a detected nonconformity
- Corrective action: Action to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity and to prevent recurrence
- Preventive action: Action to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity or other potential undesirable situation
In short, preventive action prevents occurrence
and corrective action prevents recurrence, while correction basically
refers to containment. If these terms still seem fuzzy, consider the difference
between putting out a fire versus eliminating the hazards likely to cause one.
What is the Eight disciplines (8d) CAPA
process?
Eight disciplines (8Ds) problem solving is a method
developed at Ford Motor Company used to approach and to resolve problems,
typically employed by engineers or other professionals. Focused on product and process
improvement, its purpose is to identify, correct, and eliminate recurring
problems.
8D follows the logic of the PDCA cycle. The disciplines are:
D0: Preparation and Emergency Response Actions: Plan for solving
the problem and determine the prerequisites. Provide Emergency Response Actions
D1: Use a Team: Establish a team of people with product/process
knowledge.
D2: Describe the Problem: Specify the problem by identifying in
quantifiable terms the who, what, where, when, why, how, and how many (5W2H)
for the problem.
D3: Develop Interim Containment Plan: Define and implement
containment actions to isolate the problem from any customer.
D4: Determine and Verify Root Causes and Escape Points: Identify
all applicable causes that could explain why the problem has occurred. Also
identify why the problem was not noticed at the time it occurred. All causes
shall be verified or proved. One can use five whys or Ishikawa diagrams to map causes against the
effect or problem identified.
5 Whys is an
iterative interrogative technique used to explore the cause-and-effect
relationships underlying a particular problem. The primary goal of the
technique is to determine the root cause of a defect or problem by repeating
the question "Why?". Each answer forms the basis of the next
question.
Ishikawa
diagrams
(also called fishbone diagrams, herringbone diagrams,
cause-and-effect diagrams, or Fishikawa) are causal diagrams
created by Kaoru Ishikawa that show the causes of a specific event.
D5: Verify Permanent Corrections (PCs) for Problem will resolve problem
for the customer: Using pre-production programs, quantitatively confirm
that the selected correction will resolve the problem. (Verify that the
correction will actually solve the problem.)
D6: Define and Implement Corrective Actions: Define and Implement
the best corrective actions.
D7: Prevent Recurrence / System Problems: Modify the management
systems, operation systems, practices, and procedures to prevent recurrence of
this and similar problems.
D8: Congratulate the Main Contributors to your Team: Recognize
the collective efforts of the team. The team needs to be formally thanked by
the organization.
Example :
Employee Performance
An employee
who receives a poor performance review may be given the chance
to improve by establishing a corrective action plan that sets
expectations for what is required to get back to satisfactory
performance.
The actions in an employee
corrective action plan are similar to regular performance objectives in that they are
typically designed to be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and
time-bound.
Overview: Corrective Action Plan
|
||
Type
|
||
Definition
|
A set
of actions designed to correct an issue, problem, non-compliance
or underperformance.
|
|
Related Concepts
|
The PDCA Cycle
PDCA
(plan-do-check-act, sometimes seen as plan-do-check-adjust) is a repetitive
four-stage model for continuous improvement (CI) in business process
management. The PDCA model is also known as the Deming circle/cycle/wheel,
Shewhart cycle, control circle/cycle, or plan–do–study–act (PDSA).
Plan
Establish objectives and processes required to deliver the desired results.Do
The do phase allows the plan from the previous step to be enacted. Small changes are usually tested, and data is gathered to see how effective the change is.Check
During the check phase, the data and results gathered from the do phase are evaluated. Data is compared to the expected outcomes to see any similarities and differences. The testing process is also evaluated to see if there were any changes from the original test created during the planning phase. If the data is placed in a chart it can make it easier to see any trends if the PDCA cycle is conducted multiple times. This helps to see what changes work better than others, and if said changes can be improved as well.Example: Gap analysis, or Appraisals.
Act
Also
called "Adjust", this act phase is where a process is improved.
Records from the "do" and "check" phases help identify
issues with the process. These issues may include problems, non-conformities,
opportunities for improvement, inefficiencies and other issues that result in
outcomes that are evidently less-than-optimal. Root causes of such issues are
investigated, found and eliminated by modifying the process. Risk is
re-evaluated. At the end of the actions in this phase, the process has better
instructions, standards or goals. Planning for the next cycle can proceed with
a better base-line. Work in the next do phase should not create recurrence of
the identified issues; if it does, then the action was not effective.
Concept : Begin with the End in Mind
Begin with the End in Mind means to begin each day, task, or project with a clear vision of your desired direction and destination, and then continue by flexing your proactive muscles to make things happen.
Concept : Begin with the End in Mind
Begin with the End in Mind means to begin each day, task, or project with a clear vision of your desired direction and destination, and then continue by flexing your proactive muscles to make things happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment